Proposing to expand production and use of nuclear materials!
The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) has announced its intent to prepare a programmatic environmental impact statement (PEIS) for accomplishing expanded civilian nuclear energy research and development and isotope production missions in the United States, including the role of the Fast Flux Test Facility (more here).
Fortunately, they don't always get what they want...
FAST FLUX TEXT FACILITY WILL REMAIN IDLE
WASHINGTON, DC, November 30, 2000 (ENS) - The Department of Energy (DOE) has decided against restarting the Fast Flux Test Facility (FFTF) at the Hanford Site, near Richland, Washington. "Commitments from the private and public sectors were not sufficient to justify restarting FFTF or building new facilities at this time," the agency said in its Final Nuclear Infrastructure Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement (NI-PEIS), which will be formally issued to the public in mid-December. The NI-PEIS was developed to help the department prepare for future missions, including nuclear technology research and development, medical isotope production, and production of Pu-238 to support future U.S. space exploration.
Activists said the DOE's decision marks the end of the U.S. commitment to nuclear "breeder" reactors capable of producing more plutonium than they consume. The Nuclear Control Institute (NCI) hailed DOE's decision. For almost a decade, NCI has urged DOE to decommission the FFTF on nonproliferation, economic and environmental grounds - most recently in DOE's formal restart review process. "Termination of FFTF is a victory for nuclear non-proliferation and should serve as a signal to the few remaining countries still pursuing breeder reactors that their programs are expensive dead ends," said Tom Clements, executive director of NCI. "This decision is a boost to nonproliferation efforts that have extended over decades to halt the pursuit of a nuclear fuel cycle based on weapons usable plutonium." FFTF was being considered by DOE for production of isotopes for medical and industrial purposes, but neither public nor private interest in such production materialized. "The department remains committed to its core nuclear science and technology role," said DOE Secretary Bill Richardson. "Using our current facilities, we expect to meet the nation's foreseeable needs for years to come."
- From AmeriScan: November 30, 2000
Want to know more about this issue?
Here's what researchers are finding out about the present health effects of past violations:
Now, how about just one example among thousands of the way political considerations make it impossible for us to handle nuclear materials safely?
|Was this page helpful?|
Want to help us do more?
We accept donations
Better yet, shop our online store.
Your purchase will help support not only us, but also other small businesses committed to socially & environmentally responsible practices.
Back to Top
Back to GreenSense Home
Models - Living - Family - Balance - Action - Sites - Books
The Wild Garden - MarketPlace - Green Cuisine
GreenSense General Store
About GreenSense - GreenSense Home - Comment - Report a Problem